
Thank you for visiting.
Theme music courtesy Dispersions of the Spirit of Ra :: Alternate theme music courtesy Harry Smith
There are 4 kinds of things to be found in the White Cyber-City :: visual, musical, poetic and discursive.i parse the visual obras displayed in the main gallery as:
configurations, constructions, contemplations, conformations, considerations, conjunctions or conjurations
depending on the day of the week on Jupiter.
They were all created using Photoshop 7.0, and the procedures used to transform the original digital record of some objective event were derived by application of the fundamental principles of the Alphabetic Calculus for Cosmic Idiots, so delightfully elaborated by my dear friend Eccles in a surprising forum.
Free and unrestricted noncommercial use of these pieces is permitted, and even encouraged. They are suitable for excellent quality reproduction up to 10 x 12 inches. Any and all commercial uses are prohibited without prior written permission. Copyrights to all images and texts remain with the contributing artists
CD's containing bitmap files for large printing are available for $12.00 (including postage) and may be requested via email to: hbialy@ibt.unam.mx.
Musical (except for the dual themes above) and other items are located in the Comments links at the right of each entry. Clicking on any image enlarges it. Placing the cursor over the enlarged image sometimes allows a further magnification.
All questions, of course, will be cheerfully answered.
If you find these pieces interesting, you might wish to visit the following sites devoted to some of the minds from which they derive.
This is some far out stuff, ya got here! I ain't good with all this cosmic jazz, cause I'm more comfortable with numbers, facts, logic, and debate, but, Hell, maybe I can lighten up a bit!
Barnes, Hank
What a pleasant surprise (sort of) to find you here. I have been hoping to be able to continue conversing with you, and as you know i banished myself(s) from the Dean's World forums at the final curtain of the magnificent and unique and first of a kind 12 days of cyberdrama that demolished the world's dumbest medical hypothesis and its defenders. Even though the peanut gallery is still making babbling noises, the worst offender-defender, the not dreaded not-doc but definitely dick bennett, i see has gone (and so have his dumbass smileys and twit 'cheers').
{A click of the blue, surprsing forum in the intro graph to bialys will let anyone who is here, but was not there, know what there was [and is] all about.}
We move on. Hank...the pieces here are all about logic and number. But i bet one cosmic clown or another would love to debate you about any aspect of them whatsoever. As you can plainly see from looking at them...all sides are possible.
harvey
Try it, like the radio announcer of my youth said, "You'll be glad you died.....oooops I mean did."
Dig this. The other day i wrote my dear friend Dr. Stein if he perchance had any ideas why our mutual friends, George and Susan Quasha, whose presence figures in more than a few of the pieces here, (as does Stein's) had been uncharacteristically silent the past weeks. This was his answer.
(The Quasha's work and Stein's can be found by clicking here.)
Well, I'm still havin' fun at Dean's, but I did see a few Skeptic blogs on your roll, so maybe the "movable feast" will find a new home!
I'll be back.
Hank Barnes
since not-doc-but-dick bennett has blocked me from his email i have been unable to let him know that i am broadcasting new vile insults to his high-falutin sounding academic credentials and his very little poisonous mynd (and lots and lots of sites are hitting on it too!)
since he is still speaking to you, maybe you could let him know?
thanks.
your pal in the blogosphere, g.'s favorite grandson
bialyzebloger
So glad you have your own site. Been following the debate on HIV at Dean's site, but haven't participated. Have read your book and thoroughly enjoyed it. I am not a scientist, but have been captivated by the controversy and find myself persuaded by the counter-arguments to the establishment's party line.
I do have questions...
In your book, p. 144, you relate "Team Virus's" "best shot" in their debate with Duesberg, but leave me hanging as a non-scientist as to how Duesberg would have replied to their best shot, if he had been allowed to do so. Perhaps he has done so elsewhere. Would you mind answering their best shot, either as Duesberg would or you would, or both? Is this still their best shot or has their position strengthened since then? If so, what are their strongest positions in your mind and what do you make of them?
Also, what do you make of the contention by the establishment that Koch's postulates have been satisfied?
Finally, what do you make of the recent flap in the media regarding this so-called lethal strain of HIV that destroys the immune system in 4 months and is drug resistant?
I have other questions as well, but they can wait. Please be patient with me on this. i really want to learn and understand the science and truth of the matter to the degree I can as a lay-person.
Thanks so much!
tbird (Tom)
i respond to your question set in two ways:
1. a serious, albeit cheerfully given, answer: they are addressed in the hot-wired, fascinating and surprising forum of the first post that is rewired here. it is not only mind-blowing and blazingly informative, it is also falling over funny.
2. a semi-serious bialyzebub question of my own in a musical form that can be heard here. if you know the answer maybe you could give him fauci's address....anything is better than what he peddles.
I'm still curious about how you or duesberg would counter-punch team virus' best shot and fancy footwork presented on p.144 of your book. if the answer is in your book, in the 185 page summary you linked me to or in one of duesberg's writings and i missed it, please forgive and point me to it. the same holds for my other questions regarding Koch's postulates and the alleged mutability of the HIV virus, including its recent alleged identity by the establishment with new, more deadly strains of SIV. seems suspicious to me that the collective team virus would continue to blame their failures on this pesky little virus that keeps changing so fast that noone can ever get a bead on it. but then again, i'm always on the look-out for my own and others' character defenses. even so, what's up with this recent flap about new, more virulent and deadly forms of SIV=HIV that have scientists stumped? what will it take, i wonder, for this paradigm to shift?
tbird
you seem to have the whole tamale pretty well in hand when you write
they seem to be very closed to alternate ways of looking at this controversy and unable to see that the very confusion they are part of and perpetuate through their techno-speak disconfirms their convictions.
and
seems suspicious to me that the collective team virus would continue to blame their failures on this pesky little virus that keeps changing so fast that noone can ever get a bead on it.
trust your psychoanalytical intuitions in these matters.
there is more than enough material posted in dean's world to give you duesberg's complete perspective, and you have read my book, so you have mine.
but tbird, all you need to look at is the basic falsification that started the entire discussion.
everything you think is so about it is. the proof is that until today, when it has been right in the face of fauci and his stooges for four months, not a single non-laughable argument has been presented by anybody that would call into any question at all the conclusions i present there, or the data on which they are based.
it is really a qed after 20+ years of an "epidemic". that is why i put it there with dean's contrivance.
all the rest, and i mean all, are red herrings the size of whales, but red herrings all the same...including the new and even more deadly varieties of the deadly virus that are cropping up like pandemic flu strains.
the very brief part in the book about "best-shot" is all very tongue-in-cheek. the "best-shot" of temin, gallo and blattner that i quote is so week on its face it could have been authored by caltechgal, nick dennett and dddd....daffy.
finally tbird. i created this site to engage my passions for other things besides hiv/aids education. and while i totally, like my children said a few years ago, appreciate your serious interest in these matters, my final cheerful suggestion is that you ask peter any further questions you might have about hiv/aids directly thru www.duesberg.com. he is as determined an educator as he is a scientist of the kind they don't hardly make anymore.
however, should you have questions (and as a psychoanalyst i can't imagine that you do not) about the stuff i present here, by all means ask me anything
I have added your wild art on my blogroll! I can't believe I overlooked a fellow from Bialystok. :-)
[ :-) ]E n ( n > 4 )
and now that i am a full blown blogger, here is the sort of rumination that i have frequently seen published (as bloggers call it)since i began traversing the blogosphere a few months ago
------------------
the other day at a small gathering in cuernavaca, someone asked me one of the first standard questions in the tape collection (or is it cd collection now)...."what do you do?"
the brief dialog with the perfect stranger continued as follows:
----------------------
i'm a photongrapher.
you mean photographer?
no, a photongrapher.
photographers fix, photongraphers map.
--------------------------
s/he walked away more quickly than most people when they meet me
There is a famous theophany of Persephone in the form of Isis—I trust it's famous—in a late section of Apuleius' Metamorphosis.
Worth a peek.
In back of the goddess I always see, an enormous shadow—the mother of all shadows.
The intricacy of her image covers the soul. And still the shadow looms. And then the soul flashes in its moment. And then the transformations cease, the persons are whole again, and the Great Conversation is unspeakably enriched.
It is possible to be so on the money—the breath at one with the heaving of the cellular and extra cellular matrices—that the magic calls to YOU.
The exercise is of the profoundest simplicity. It is a votive matter. Commitment to that which cannot come on board the ship of STATES. It hovers on the brink and funds it all. It is the star to every wand'ring bark / Whose worth's unknown although his height be taken. (Don't quote me). Nor is this platonISM, inspite of myself. But the work can get so fine, the ether subtle, that distance itself inverts and what you want, wants YOU. Like I say.
Money, health, probity, wisdom, charity, grace. Persphone's beauty in a box.
Turn on it,
And all of 'em's yours for a …
cs
he also wrote :: this :: from which, this ::
1.
if this be Platonism
and upon me proved
pfui…
all power to the Soviets)
2.
The figure of the Kosmos
of Babylon
"wheels within wheels"
Blake cursed it
until today
(through Newton's Sleep)
cursed all who think the form
of the universe
were Being's Song
or other than the Same
that the Old Nododaddy had
an enemy
and our allegiance
to other than Himself
proscribed—
the gods are general
ideas
from which we all
must work to make us free
and all must strive and climb
until collapse at last
of the Vast Machine of the Archons
…(then sing another song as well
Thu Sep 8, 9:06 AM ET
The owners of a Japanese restaurant who claim their newly renovated building is haunted are being sued by their landlord for refusing to move in.
An offer to hold an exorcism was refused, according to the 2.6 million dollar lawsuit filed by the owners of the Church Street Station entertainment complex last month in Orange County Circuit Court.
The lawsuit also asks a judge to decide whether the building is haunted and, if so, whether the ghosts would interfere with the restaurant's business.
Christopher and Yoko Chung had planned to move their Amura Japanese Restaurant into the building in October 2004, but backed out of the lease.
The Chungs' attorney says subcontractors gave several documented reports of having seen ghosts or apparitions in the restaurant at night. The attorney also says Christopher Chung's religious beliefs require him to "avoid encountering or having any association with spirits or demons."
___
Information from: Orlando Sentinel, http://www.orlandosentinel.com
I never thought of Geneneticist has doing undo the human body has computer programmers do with computers..DNA and Amino acids and protein synthesis being like binary code. I guess you guys already figured that out.
David,
Don't believe everything you hear. I wonder a much more basic question (and all the time) -- namely "what role the mind?"
Finalmente, re: codes, genetic and otherwise, have you tread this?
Kuntu Zhangpo